12-16-2011, 06:46 PM
My opinions on this topic are varied. I do believe it's "in the eye of the beholder".
I hate "art critics/experts" for one simple reason: They didn't conceive nor give birth to what their critiq-ing on (so in my mind, their full of shit).
And as for the experts on the masters; when i listen or read about them dissecting sculpture, the written word, painting or any other form of "art" from (usually) 100's of years ago i think to myself:
"jack of all trades and master of none".
To say "this iswhat Da Vinci, Monet, Constable etc was thinking, expressing etc when he done this piece is just an opinion (Shit). Their like AssHoles, we all have them!!
That's just my 10 cents worth


I hate "art critics/experts" for one simple reason: They didn't conceive nor give birth to what their critiq-ing on (so in my mind, their full of shit).
And as for the experts on the masters; when i listen or read about them dissecting sculpture, the written word, painting or any other form of "art" from (usually) 100's of years ago i think to myself:
"jack of all trades and master of none".
To say "this iswhat Da Vinci, Monet, Constable etc was thinking, expressing etc when he done this piece is just an opinion (Shit). Their like AssHoles, we all have them!!
That's just my 10 cents worth



