Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
<
[-]
Welcome To Rant Central
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username:
  

Password:
  




Porn: A Woman's Crime
#31
Did the O.P. ever stop to think that maybe the porn wouldn't be so offensive if he didn't watch it? Some people worry about lots of things, but they seem to forget that they have the power to ignore it. By worrying about it, you're the one who's empowering porn with the power to bother you. If you stop worrying, you take away its ability to control you.
[Image: MyUserBar2.gif]
Reply
#32
^^^^That would be the easy, correct thing to do. But people have to try and be do good'ers by pushing their values on others. But by making their opinions and values known, they show their cards as to how fucked up they are inside really...since they have no objective edit inside of themselves.

in this case OP showed how f-ed up his thinking was about women in general just by in the words he used in his posts. People have to try and twist themselves out of thinking that they are fucked up by believing that the girls who make porn videos are an evil abomination. And how dare they invade their minds and corrupt what would be an otherwise god fearing Christian man with their filth by making them stare and whack off to it...Those bitches should be put to the torture racks to drain the evil out of them, for getting those otherwise, good, god fearing men to derail off the path of righteousness . BITCHES!! AAAAAAAAAAAAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHHAHAH

These are the same dumb fucks who think it's appropriate to protest funerals too!! that reeeeeaallll git down Christianity shit!
Reply
#33
It's always entertaining to see how people, when intellectually exhausted, just start to assume I'm preaching Christian fundamentalism, as if Christianity is the only philosophy of morality. My position is fair, coldly objective, and stems from Natural Law (what's scientifically natural and unnatural). Read each one of my posts and you'll find that I am intellectually consistent on each one (I just use strong language in the OP).

My position that the majority of female porn sluts are abominations isn't an opinion. It's a fact of nature. I can prove that by asking men to answer this question:

Guys, if you were offered $500 (average internet porn scene, i.e. college rules, bangbus, fuckteam 5, etc), would you get naked on camera, eat out a chick, fuck her proper for a bit, then finger bang her towards orgasm, have her stream her cum in your mouth, swallow it, and leave with blue balls? If you let her fuck you in the ass with a strapon you get a $200 bonus. Oh, and your video is permanently available online so your family, coworkers, wife, and children can discover it in the future.

Unless you're a bum off the street or genuinely mindfucked, you know you wouldn't. It makes no natural sexual sense at all. You serviced a chick, got humiliated by her (she came in your mouth), and didn't even get to blow your load! And the video is permanently available online for ALL to see. For $2000+ (AAA porn pay), maybe you'd do it, but still probably wouldn't. Don't lie.

That is exactly the vile, bizarre, and humiliating treatment women of porn submit to, by and large. Women are the far more delicate and clean of the two genders, yet straight men would NEVER submit to the vile shit that women of porn do (see my question above). A dude doing heterosexual porn gets grossed out if he merely crosses swords with another dude during a gangbag!

For this reason women who do porn are factually human abominations. They are performing permanently documented sex acts that are disgusting, humiliating, and make zero sexual sense...for meager pay.

Want to argue this point with me? Then dudes, answer my question above. Gals, tell me if you'd be willing to do a standard porn scene and for how much?
Reply
#34
(10-28-2013, 02:19 AM)Steve89 Wrote: Guys, if you were offered $500 (average internet porn scene, i.e. college rules, bangbus, fuckteam 5, etc), would you get naked on camera, eat out a chick, fuck her proper for a bit, then finger bang her towards orgasm, have her stream her cum in your mouth, swallow it, and leave with blue balls? If you let her fuck you in the ass with a strapon you get a $200 bonus. Oh, and your video is permanently available online so your family, coworkers, wife, and children can discover it in the future.

Unless you're a bum off the street or genuinely mindfucked, you know you wouldn't.

I've held off posting, because I disagree with you so strongly, that I thought I may get banned if I answered the way I really felt. You are so far off base, that I can't even begin to respond logically, except through numbers like above.
So, let's do the math? Shall we? Assuming your figures are correct.

I bet the average abomination and scum of the earth, according to you, would do at least two internet videos a week? Don't you think? They are such horrible sluts after all. Let's say 3 a week, just to be fair.

That is $1500 a week. $2100 a week if you include the ass stuff.

That's good money. $2100 a week nets you $109,200 dollars a year. For three porn scenes, where you (boo hoo) have to fuck someone without cumming. They all know this before hand too, btw. This isn't brand new information. The 'not cummin' thing. And also, btw, no one stops anyone from cumming in porn movies (except some specialty ones, which we don't need to discuss here). You make it seem as though they aren't allowed to. Like they will get punished if they do.

I could go on and on, but I won't, since arguing against your position is like proving the moon isn't made of cheese. What's the point?

Back to the money though...Most people in the world will never make that much money in a year, not to mention the millions and millions that will never make that much money their whole life.

You will argue that 3 scenes a week isn't the norm. Maybe it isn't, but even one a week that makes $700, isn't half bad, money wise.

It's far far more than minimum wage in every country that has one.

You wanted an answer to your ridiculous question.

I personally wouldn't do it. You may not do it (that's questionable at the moment). But because someone else does, it is no reason to condemn them out of hand, or to assume anything about them.

One last thing. You act as though as all of this is a recent developement. It isn't. People have been doing so called 'perverted' things since the beginning of time. Do you think the ancient Romans didn't have ass to mouth? Are you kidding me?

And women have been 'not cumming' for centuries. That is nothing new. Not something to be proud of, as a society, but not new.

Think before you type.
that those with no rights,
display the right to have no life, to have respect they must accept
a world commiting suicide
Reply
#35
Ah Skinny...I was going to respond last night...I had the OP up on another screen to reference, I had my points I was going to make. Then I erased everything and was going to say it was just his opinion and nobody cared, and that I used the over the board Christianity example to show how off the board his view was.. but I didn't quite feel comfortable with the way I crafted my response. I wasn't sure if my point would come across . Because Op's point is pointless, I just deleted my response.

Thanks to you though, Your articulation made it easy for me, so now I can just say: "I agree with you 100%"

If OP in his mind was against porn , I could see his stance as an apt one, since he was going to run the streets clean of porn, and he had a stance and battlewords with all people couldn't ignore...

BUT He says he likes to get off like the next guy , AND he says the women abominations, the same skin , hair, (whatever) would NOT be an abomination if the money she gets paid was just that much more...

so his crusade is useless, His tirades are inconsequential he is trying to make us believe his full of shittness is correct so he can convince himself.
Reply
#36
Quote:I bet the average abomination and scum of the earth, according to you, would do at least two internet videos a week? Don't you think? They are such horrible sluts after all. Let's say 3 a week, just to be fair.

That is $1500 a week. $2100 a week if you include the ass stuff.

That's good money. $2100 a week nets you $109,200 dollars a year. For three porn scenes, where you (boo hoo) have to fuck someone without cumming. They all know this before hand too, btw. This isn't brand new information. The 'not cummin' thing. And also, btw, no one stops anyone from cumming in porn movies (except some specialty ones, which we don't need to discuss here). You make it seem as though they aren't allowed to. Like they will get punished if they do.

You actually bring up a fair and reasonable point that merits further examination. In fact you compelled me to dig a little deeper into the facts. After doing some research, a mere $30,000 is the average "salary" for any given porn slut. This applies to any given broad you see on Redtube, Tnaflix, [insert favorite tube site].

I examined the IMDB results for a random sample of porn bitches to determine the average scenes per year these sluts do. They are:

Ashli Orion: 33/year
*Teagan Presley: 18/year
*Isis Taylor: 22/year
*Vanessa Lane: 28/year
Alexis Glory: 2/year
Annika Albright: 41/year
Elizabeth Bentley: 20/year
*Bibi Jones: 12/year
Lexi Sweet: 2/year
*Sarah Vandella: 22/year
Mia Lelani: 14/year

* = "big name" sluts that have official websites.

If you do the math, this averages to 20 scenes per year. This is probably inflated because half of the list are big name "career" sluts who do more scenes. So how much money do they actually make?

Being the perverted abominations they all are, I generously assume they get paid the maximum anal rate ($1500/scene avg). This works out to a mere $30,000 / year.

Porn Pay Scale sources:
http://blog.videobox.com/blog/index.php/...tars-make/

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/se...en&ct=clnk

The 2013 U.S. poverty line is $11,000, so $30,000 is probably livable for these bitches, but keep in mind their pay is significantly less because I made some generous assumptions - 1.) half the girls in my IMDB pool are big names 2.) I assumed high side anal pay rate of $1500/scene.

Realistically, the average bitch we jerk off too (myself included) on Redtube or Youjizz makes 10-20k/year doing occasional, casual porn. Fucking mind boggling given the shame and humiliation they submit to...oh and it's available online for eternity so your parents, children and coworkers can discover it. Oh, and the porn industry provides excellent health coverage for all the STD's you're guaranteed to contract! That's a lot of blowjobs, denied orgasms, anal abuse and cum on the face just to GET BY in today's economy...and then once the freight train of guilt forces you out of porn you're left with NO savings, probably no degree, disgusting memories, STDs, and a LIFETIME of shame knowing your vile acts are available online forever. Worth 20, MAYBE 30k/year? Hell no, unless your mindfucked.

The amount of moral bankruptcy required for a girl to resort to porn blows my fucking mind. I think it's very fair and objective to conclude that girls who do porn today are truly perverted, and abominations for their gender. Hell, a lot of porn sluts agree with me. They commonly ADMIT to being freaks of nature, case closed. Quit trying to defend them! There is a VERY good reason YOU, the reader, would not do the porn women submit to. It's because you are a normal, sensible human being.

Porn is awesome and satisfying on the surface, but it is ultimately evil at its core. Don't be fucking naïve. Porn wires young adolescent minds to think that casual, whimsical sex with random girls without condoms is normal. It wires them to think that sex is all about the man's pleasure and stops when he pulls out and cums in the girl's mouth as she bows before him. This is the shit kids are GROWING UP with now, and they WILL discover porn in all but the most draconian uses of parental protection. Porn manipulates and distracts good men by exploiting their natural lust. Far easier to fix the FEW women that enable porn rather than fix the 100% of normal men who consume it. Porn is a woman's crime.
Reply
#37
(10-30-2013, 03:10 AM)Steve89 Wrote: Porn is awesome and satisfying on the surface, but it is ultimately evil at its core. Don't be fucking naïve. Porn wires young adolescent minds to think that casual, whimsical sex with random girls without condoms is normal. It wires them to think that sex is all about the man's pleasure and stops when he pulls out and cums in the girl's mouth as she bows before him. This is the shit kids are GROWING UP with now, and they WILL discover porn in all but the most draconian uses of parental protection. Porn manipulates and distracts good men by exploiting their natural lust. Far easier to fix the FEW women that enable porn rather than fix the 100% of normal men who consume it. Porn is a woman's crime.

Wow.. my mind is in all directions. I feel like I got hit with a stop sign or something. I'm thinking, is the OP real, or is it a puppet account from within to get us to rage at the topic at hand?

If you're really looking to get rid of porn, then your're gonna have to start by having families have reasonable discussions about this stuff. sit them all down and tell them about the not nice things you see on TV. Sound reasonable?? Sound doable??? Fuck no ! with most families today, they aren't the Brady Bunch with all lifes lessons learned at the days end...I methinks you be giving WAY too much credit to porn to "wire young adolescent minds"...

the adolescent's mind is being wired regardless of whether or not there is porn on the tv or, found in daddy's bookcase (remember playboy BOOKS, before the awesome internets shitz). Ya, there is a call for more porn, due to the internet, since they found the internet was a way to transfer porn (I'll bow to the god that thought of that !)

It was always there, and it was always the woman's choice to do so, it's no crime. If anything, it's generating jobs for people without skillsets would not otherwise have...

Since you say it's a crime, why aren't the women getting arrested? I used to work in the law field... I saw no law that states women who do porn are an ABOMINATION and are to be arrested (unless they make good money, then part A section 1 : AAABABES get a pass bekuz ther $$$ justifies their humiliation.

If we lived in a land where your laws applied?? oh man, that place would be Canada!
Reply
#38
(10-18-2013, 12:06 PM)Steve89 Wrote: *sigh* Typical straw man argument speculating about the author's personal life rather than intelligently debating the issue of the post.

You misunderstand the point of the essay - porn is awesome, WOMEN who do porn are abominations.

Wow. There are so many things wrong with that statement.
"porn is awesome, WOMEN who do porn are abominations" - that's what is known as a "contradiction".

To put it another way: You love porn, but you hate the women in it. I'm not buying it. IMHO, Porn is a Sexual Outlet. Not everyone is in a relationship, nor can they find the time to be in one for that matter, and every human being that is sexually active has a need to satisfy their carnal cravings, which is where porn comes in.

Porn is a masturbatory aid, whose main purpose is to release all the sexual tension. It is not the cause of your problems, nor is it to blame for your problems. And the fact that you enjoy watching the women have sex in porn (I'm assuming that, btw), but you hate that they are doing that, suggests that you might have some guilt issues when it comes to sexual gratification.

In other words, I think you feel guilty about pleasuring yourself to porn.

To which I say, There is nothing wrong to fapping to a porn movie. Just chill.
But then again...Maybe it's something all together different...

Maybe the reason you hate the women in porn might stem from a relationship you had with a woman. Maybe in this relationship, she was watching porn and masturbating to it, and you may have gotten upset, or maybe even jealous.

Either way, Your "issue" with women in porn movies is a deeply rooted psychological problem, that you should look into addressing soon.
Boobies...They makes me smile. Cool
Reply
#39
I agree with @SteRipper
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity.
- Robert A. Heinlein
Reply
#40
How the hell is it her mistake if she's an adult? She can do whatever she wishes as long as it isn't malevalent in nature, if you are offended by porn, it CLEARLY says "If you're offended by pornographic and explicit content, LEAVE NOW."
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)